A Dynamic View of Global Integration and Local Responsiveness Framework

Uyen-Minh Le, Tung-Shan Liao


Global-Integration and Local-Responsiveness (IR) framework with four pairs of external environment and appropriate international strategy types has contributed significantly to international business management. Nevertheless, the framework is still incomplete and lacks dynamic features. To deal with such limitations and enhance the theory, this paper, therefore, brings dynamic features regarding both environment and strategy into the IR grid. Under a dynamic capability angle with three steps of sensing, seizing and transforming [30], the dynamic global integration and local responsiveness framework – a new concept building for international business – would be explicated.

Full Text:



Acs, Z. J., & Preston, L. (1997). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Technology, and Globalization: Introduction to a Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy. Small Business Economics, 9, 1-6.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49-61.

Barney, J. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Bartlett, C. A. (2004). P&G Japan: The SK-II Globalization Project. Harvard Business School, 9-303-003.

Bartlett, C. A., & Beamish, P. (2010). Transnational Management: Text, Cases & Readings In Cross-Border Management (6th ed.): McGraw-Hill Education.

Bartlett, C. A., &Ghoshal, S. (1993). Managing across borders: new strategic requirements. Organization of Transnational Corporation, 6, 309-325

Cavusgil, S. T., Knight, G. A., &Riesenberger, J. R. (2011). International business: The new realities: Pearson

Celly, N. (2012). Haier in India: Building presence in a mass market beyond China. Asia Case Research Centre, HKU978.

Daniels, J. D., Radebaugh, L. H., & Sullivan, D. P. (2013). International business: Environments and operations (Fourteenth ed.): Pearson Education.

Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., &Venaik, S. (2000). The optimal performance of the global firm: Formalizing and extending the integration-responsiveness framework. Organization Science, 11(6), 674-695.

Dyer, J., Furr, N., &Lefrandt, C. (2014). The Industries Plagued by the Most Uncertainty. Harvard Business Review.

Farhoomand, A. (2010). Honda: Innovation the Chinese way. Asia Case Research Centre, HKU887.

Ghemawat, P., Hout, T. M., & Siegel, J. I. (2005). Haier's U.S. Refrigerator Strategy. Harvard Business School, 705-475.

Ghoshal, S., &Nohria, N. (1993). Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Review, 34, 23-23.

Harzing, A.-W. (2000). An empirical analysis and extension of the Bartlett and Ghoshal typology of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (1), 101-120.

Helfat, C., &Peteraf, M. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strategic organization, 7(1), 91-102.

Hrynyshyn, D. (2002). Technology and Globalization. Studies in Political Economy, 67(1), 83-106.

Igami, M., & Yang, N. (2016). Unobserved heterogeneity in dynamic games: Cannibalization and preemptive entry of hamburger chains in Canada. Quantitative Economics, 7, 483-521.

Luo, Y. (2001). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378.

Matusitz, J., & Forrester, M. (2009). Successful glocalization practices: the case of Seiyu in Japan. Journal of Transnational Management, 14(2), 155-176.

Meyer, K. E., & Su, Y.-S. (2015). Integration and responsiveness in subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of World Business, 50, 149-158.

Michalek, J. J., Ebbes, P., Adigüzel, F., Feinberg, F. M., &Papalambros, P. Y. (2011). Enhancing marketing with engineering: Optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 1-12.

Mitrega, M., &Pfajfar, G. (2015). Business relationship process management as company dynamic capability improving relationship portfolio. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 193-203.

Piper, T. (2006). STAR 2003. Harvard Business School, 9-204-014.

Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic management journal, 12(S2), 95-117.

Qu, R., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Market orientation and business performance in MNC foreign subsidiaries - Moderating effects of integration and responsiveness. Journal of Business Research, 68, 919-924.

Rice, J., Liao, T.-S., Galvin, P., & Martin, N. (2015). A configuration-based approach to integrating dynamic capabilities and market transformation in small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 33(3), 231-253.

Rugman, A., & Hodgetts, R. (2001). The end of global strategy. European Management Journal, 19(4), 333-343.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., &Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23956/ijermt.v6i8.119


  • There are currently no refbacks.